Showing posts with label Encyclopedic Palace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Encyclopedic Palace. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Marino Auriti’s Encyclopedic Palace Returns to the American Folk Art Museum



It’s a real pleasure to report that my grandfather’s great labor of love, the Encyclopedic Palace, is back at the American Folk Art Museum as part of the show “American Perspectives: Stories from the American Folk Art Museum Collection.”


The show looks to be full of riches: work by Nella Mae Rowe, Sister Gertrude Morgan, Consuelo “Chelo” González Amézcua, a beautiful Freedom quilt by Jessie Bell Telfair, paintings by my longtime hero Ralph Fasanella, and plenty of other artists whose names have been lost but whose work endures. The show is up through May 31, 2020. For a nice piece about it on NY1 by Juan Manuel Benítez, go here.

This link to the February 6th episode of NYC-Arts will take you to a re-broadcast of a 2015 interview that curator Valérie Rousseau gave about the Encyclopedic Palace (that clip comes in toward the end, at about 21:26).


And here are my earlier posts about the Encyclopedic Palace—its journey from a storage locker, where it sat for twenty-two years, to the Folk Art Museum when my family donated it in 2003; and three posts from 2013 (and early 2014) when the Encyclopedic Palace miraculously became the centerpiece of the 55th Venice Biennale curated by Massimiliano Gioni. Finally, a piece by Leigh Anne Miller about that “backstory” from Art in America in 2013.

Thank you for reading. And thank you for dreaming with me. 


Saturday, September 23, 2017

The Encyclopedic Palace at the Outsider Art Fair



Marino Auriti's Encyclopedic Palace will be in Paris at the Outsider Art Fair, October 19-22, 2017. I doubt he would have had any use for the label "outsider"; but he would have loved the architecture of Paris. The backstory of my grandfather's great work can be read here in my 2012 post about the Venice Biennale. 

He'd have been amazed to read that his was "an eccentric if touching case of postwar America's imperial mentality (i.e. an encyclopedic palace of the world in the capital of the United States)" as whoever wrote this on Wikipedia put it. As someone who fled the Fascists and lost his homeland, he'd have found this baffling. And likely not "touching," since he wasn't someone who dealt in condescension. 

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Dreams, Resurrected: The Encyclopedic Palace at the Venice Biennale

“Memory’s images, once they are fixed in words, are erased,” Polo said. “Perhaps I am afraid of losing Venice all at once, if I speak of it…”
—Italo Calvino, Invisible Cities

I’m looking at an advertisement where a woman stands looking over her shoulder at the viewer, and I know exactly where she is. She’s on the second-floor loggia of the Doge’s Palace and, behind her, across the Bacino San Marco, is Palladio’s Church of San Giorgio Maggiore. Years before I found myself staring deeply at an Absolut ad (“Absolut Venice”) that had pigeons arranged in the shape of the vodka bottle, and I was holding it very close to my face to see if any of the photoshopped pigeons had been repeated. That night I had a dream that I was with my sister in a fantastic circular flying machine that was spinning effortlessly along the edge of Dorsoduro, along the Fondamenta delle Zattere, hovering just inches above the water. I could see everything outside us with the utmost clarity. We crossed the Grand Canal and hewed close to the shore, passing the Piazzetta, the south-facing front of the Palazzo Ducale, the Riva degli Schiavoni. My sister and I, over our complicated blue-lit consoles in our pod-like flying machine, couldn’t believe our luck.


The stuff of dreams. Ruskin called his beloved Piazza Ducale “the central building of the world.”

The first time I went to Venice was in the early ’90s. Late one day I found myself in Canneregio trying to get to the other side of Venice before the Guggenheim closed. I was young and very much aware of the fare la bella figura phenomenon and so of course was too cool to walk with a map in my hand. So what I would do was find a dark, narrow sottoportego, pull out the map and memorize my path, put it away and then make my way through the maze of calli and campi until I needed the map again. I was dashing through a campo when something amazing happened. I heard a man call my name: Firmani! 


I stopped in my tracks, and turned to see who it was. And there he was, some man, sitting at a table decorated with a red bunting, holding out a pen to me. My first thought was, How does he know my name? My people are not from Venice. It freaked me out and I took to my heels, and got to the Guggenheim before closing. Later, on my way back across town to our hotel, I went through the same square. Now it was deserted but the table was still there, its red bunting half-fallen off. On the wall behind the lonely table was a sign, white lettering against a red ground: Partito Socialista Italiano.

What I’d heard was Firmate, not Firmani. He’d merely been asking people to sign something for the socialist party.

But so uncanny is Venice—so dreamlike and yet indelibly familiar—that I was perfectly willing to believe that this unknown man knew my name. He knew my name, part of me understood, because I was supposed to be there.


*
Venice lived in my memory before I ever visited it, and yet I still can’t get my hands around it. I’ve chased it through many pages, of Mary McCarthy and Italo Calvino and John Pemble and Henry James, Andrea de Robilant, Jan Morris and John Ruskin. And yet the more I read the more it recedes from me, there but not there in a strange pink shimmer. 



Ruskin is no kind of easy to the 21st century ear, but his love of architecture and will to understand it
and his fervor to explain his (often idiosyncratic) conclusionspulls me in. He is not at heart a systematizer, and yet he tries to be, which in a place as various and order-resistant as Venice (where, de Robilant writes, the centuries-old custom of wearing masks from October until Lent “added a little intrigue and mystery to everyday life”) seems a fool’s errand. “Picking the spot on earth most overgrown with art, he would find the order that must lie buried beneath,” the extraordinary architecture writer Robert Harbison says of Ruskin in Eccentric Spaces. “He gave up, of course, before numbering every stone, and by the third volume [of The Stones of Venice] talks about anything but buildings.” I read a pathetically chopped-down version of The Stones of Venice, but even so I could feel Ruskin’s ardor giving way to something like exhaustion in the course of its pages. Venice has suggested death and decay for many visitors for many years, but Ruskin might be unique in pushing back the starting date of Venice’s period of decline all the way to 1418when the Renaissance and the notion of man-made perfection began to encroach on his beloved God-centered Gothic. 


Ruskin hated this building. Go here for a very well done discussion of The Stones of Venice by Janice Daul in an online exhibit from the University of Mary Washington. Also see the amazing Churches of Venice website, where I found this image.

In writing about Venetian campi, Harbison, who regularly stuns the reader with miraculous insights and meltingly beautiful sentences, makes the observation “…because every surface in Venice is built, every one has the capacity to fall into disrepair, hence the city’s mournfulness…” Sometimes walking the streets in the less travelled sestieri, I would turn my face to a broken window and the deepest, coldest blast of air would come out; in Manhattan I associate this with construction sites, but in Venice it feels like a memento mori. Everything in this city, where you can readily put your hand on a thousand-year-old wall, is to some degree a ruin.  



“Nothing is quite symmetrical in Venice—the Piazza is not only irregular, but also slopes toward the Basilica, and has a heavy floor pattern that does not fit.” Jan Morris, The World of Venice.
 
It is also a place haunted by so much looking. It’s as if so many years of this looking have left a trace on the thing being looked at, physically worn it down not by touch but by the sheer force of ardor. Conversely, the mere fact of its innumerable pleasures to the eyethe “loot,” as Mary McCarthy saysembedded in its churches and building walls and bridges can make you feel as if you are the only person who could possibly have noticed and loved that particular roundel, that cryptic patera, that ancient corroded shutter dog shaped like a tiny man. Since you love it, maybe in your mind the thing becomes uniquely yours. Harbison again on Venice, from Eccentric Spaces: “Because it is more intricate, it is more private than other cities, making everyone feel he knows her best.”
 
Could this postcard be commemorating the moment in the First World War when the horses of St. Mark’s were “…shipped away in a barge for safety: through the lagoon and down the dismal tributaries of the Po, watched all along the route by sad groups of villagers, and eventually to the garden of the Palazzo Venezia in Rome…”? Jan Morris wrote those words, as well as a great many others in a style that is at times eye-closingly delicious, with both a leisure and precision I’d imagine it impossible to replicate by any American writer. Morris also wrote this warning to the wise: “More slush has been written about Venice than anywhere else on earth, more acres of ecstatic maiden prose.”

Some years back I found myself at a party in a beautiful old classic eight on the Upper West Side, the home of a newspaper editor. It was during that often terrible period in a woman’s life known as one’s late 20s, and I was unable to make any kind of smart conversation, was tied in a thousand knots, and retreated into the empty living room to hide. There was an old engraving over the mantelpiece and, moving to look more closely, I realized it was San Zaccaria. I felt my heart flood. It was like this: I had been there—it had been wonderful—there was a feeling of newness then—that feeling was gone. And yet there was San Zaccaria, looking the same in this 16th century engraving as it looked when I had seen it in my lifetime. It remained the same over so many years, while I had changed, and—a piece of melodrama I very much believed at the time—for the worse, in a much shorter time.

The host, nice as he was, had followed me into the living room. I turned to him and opened my mouth to say something of this, explain what seeing this image meant to me and maybe along with it apologize for my general wretchedness. But when I tried to speak I couldn’t say anything at all.

“I know, dear,” he said, patting my arm sympathetically, “it looks just the same now, doesn’t it?”


The unthinkable: the Campanile collapses, 1902.
From RIBA's website.

And so for me Venice is about architecture, it is about memory, it is about an irreplicable experience of place; and it is also my own personal repository of dreams. Perfect then that this city, which lived in my heart in such a strange and singular way, should be the city in my grandfather’s homeland where his labor of love would be shared with the world.
*

Years back I was talking with a composer about the Encyclopedic Palace, and he suggested that it might have owed its origin to the idea of the memory palace—a mnemonic device in which a person organizes thoughts or facts into an imagined structure, and visually walks through that structure to recall them. The Encyclopedic Palace would be a kind of realization of such a structure, idea made reality. 



The Temple of Time, created by educator Emma Willard, “a three-dimensional projection of historical chronography.” Image and text from Mnemotechnics.org.
Architects Donlyn Lyndon and Charles W. Moore took the idea of a memory palace as their organizing principle in Chambers for a Memory Palace, an exchange of letters that contain their thoughts on the places that speak to them, organized into something like typologies with “nameable parts [and] ephemeral sensations.” I read the book wrongly, as if to find a key to architectural understanding (my own Key to All Mythologies), rather than reading it for the writers’ very specific architectural pleasures. I came across this sentence: “Memories lodge in places that are distinct.” My old officemate Michael and I, working in the World Trade Center on September 11th and both delayed in getting to the office that day for different reasons, both felt the need to make lists of the things that were on our desks when the Trade Center came down. It was not a distinct place, and maybe we both knew our memories would quickly recede, that maybe all the media directed at the event, the endless replication of horrible images, would have the effect of obliterating our own very specific memories.

When I think of Venice, I think of singularity, of the impossible vistas that come to you at every turn and stay so indelibly in the mind. I think of Damian and me sitting on a bench in Giudecca, after seeing Ai Weiwei’s Straight—a commentary on unethical and inhumane architecture—looking across the water to the Piazzetta as a huge cruise ship, like some insane floating apartment building, sails by, completely obscuring the city for one long minute.

*

It was amazing to come out of the train station this last September and see, down the steps and right in front on a bright red kiosk, a poster for Il Palazzo Enciclopedico. I had to stop and stare at it, touch it. The sight would be repeated across the city—on signs, banners, advertisements, maps, guides. What’s impossible to explain is the crazy dissonance that came from seeing what had been for my family for many years a very private combination of words now written across an entire city. It’s the name of the architectural model that my grandfather built, but it’s also the name of the Biennale and the organizing principal behind the show—and, in a way, it’s as if the Biennale became a sort of realization of the actual museum that my grandfather envisioned. 

And so, I find myself out of words before I even get there. How can I explain what it was to come into the Arsenale and be greeted by a wall with the story of the Encyclopedic Palace written across it? On November 16, 1955, self-taught Italian-American artist Marino Auriti filed a design with the U.S. patent office… And then to step around the wall and see, raised up on a dais in the middle of an enormous room, the Encyclopedic Palace.


Of course, I cried.

And again I struggle to think what my grandfather, a dour, anti-grandstanding, supremely un-whimsical man would have made of the whole thing. I loved the show, the thoughtfulness of the curation and the very smart ideas about visual progression—how wonderful it was to go into the room beyond the Encyclopedic Palace and see, suspended from the ceiling, Roberto Cuoghi’s Belinda, in size and massing a kind of inverted Encyclopedic Palace. The section curated by Cindy Sherman, her own “imaginary museum,” blew me away; for me, she defines what it is to understand the punctum in a photograph, haunting, funny or unheimlich—Linda Fregni Nagler’s collection of Victorian photographs, The Hidden Mother, were sometimes all three—and the sculpture Sherman curated (Jimmie Durham, Mirosław Bałka, Charles Ray, among others) was just as uncanny. I could talk of many more great things throughout the Biennale, Lara Almarcegui’s piles, Nikolay Bakharev’s photographs, Guo Fengyi’s drawings, Kan Xuan’s video series, Eva Kotátková’s installation, Lin Xue’s drawings, A.G. Rizzoli’s visions, Welcome to Iraq, Ai Weiwei’s chairs, the artists of the Indonesian pavilion, those of the Chinese pavilion (particularly Shu Yong and Wang Qingsong) the artists of the Latin American pavilion…many more. And how it felt to see my grandfather’s name in this continuum, one artist among many.

Even if what he was at heart was an architect.



And that is maybe the closest I can get to it. The more tangible the idea of my grandfather being put on a world stage becomes, the more the actual story behind it feels like a fiction, something private and inexplicable. And so perhaps I am afraid of losing my own experience all at once, if I continue to write of it. Now I will just let it live in my mind, as images and sensations, and let the words disperse into the air.  


Sunday, June 23, 2013

The Encyclopedic Palace, Part III

 
The Encyclopedic Palace at the Arsenale in Venice.
Francesco Galli, courtesy of La Biennale di Venezia 

What a huge outpouring of love my grandfather’s architectural model has received from all over the world – from the time of the announcement that it would go to Venice for the Biennale, to its trip there, to its reassembly and unveiling in the Arsenale. The whole journey still seems like a miracle to me.  

Here’s my attempt to bring together as many posts as possible about Marino Auriti and his great labor of love. First, the post I wrote in 2012 about the Encyclopedic Palace’s course from my grandfather’s garage to a storage locker in Delaware, where it languished for 22 years, to the American Folk Art Museum. And then the post about when we learned it would go to the Biennale.  

Here’s a video from the American Folk Art Museum that shows the art handlers packing it up so carefully for its trip to Italy:


An eblast from the AFAM:


A lovely, thoughtful article, “The Museum of Babel,” by Stefany Anne Golberg in The Smart Set.

The Backstory of the Venice Biennale,” by Leigh Anne Miller, who interviewed my sister Colette (aka Poogy) and me, and did such a great job with it – a joy to read.

An article by Alessia Gargiulo from a Milan-based website called Swide – with some zany typos and factual errors, but a nice piece nonetheless.  

The American Folk Art Museum’s tumblr page about the Encyclopedic Palace at the Biennale.

Another tumblr page that someone set up.

Marino’s biography on his hometown’s website.

A photo sent to me by Sandro Salvi, the mayor of Guardiagrele – a banner hung across an entrance to the town to welcome the cyclists of the Giro d’Italia:


A gazillion Twitter feeds. 

The many New York Times articles about the show and/or curator Massimiliano Gioni, with mentions of Marino’s work in just about all of them. 

Vogue Living Australia’s blog

Something in Brazilian Vogue.

A mention in German Vogue.

Something on Gioni in Italian Vogue.

A mention in French Vogue.

An article from Style.com.

A talk with Gioni from Wmagazine.

A video with Guardian art critic Adrian Searle on the Biennale, with some great stuff about the Encyclopedic Palace toward the end – just before he lays down on a bench and cycles his legs in the air. Lovely! Somehow he reminds me of Mark E. Smith.


 

And this really cracked me up – “two ‘soft’ (Oldenburg-like) versions of Marino Auriti’s ‘Encyclopedic Palace of the World’” by Macau artist and architect Carlos Marreiros – who has clearly read his Rem Koolhass. With thanks to my talented and beautiful niece, Adrienne Fitzgerald, for finding that. 



 

Finally, a laconic Wikipedia entry that someone (?) has written about my grandfather – which is perfect, because Wikipedia might be the closest thing we have to realizing the dream of his limitless place of knowledge. Or maybe that’s the internet itself. At any rate, I give up! It’s impossible to achieve anything like completion. The internet is too vast, the duplications and reduplications (and curious distortions) seemingly infinite.


And with that, it’s time to go before I risk plagiarizing Borges.

See you in Venice in September.  



Saturday, February 23, 2013

The Encyclopedic Palace at the 2013 Biennale di Venezia


Friends!  I was so overwhelmed by the amazing news that the Encyclopedic Palace is not only going to the 2013 Venice Biennale but that they named the whole ever-loving Biennale after it pinch me! – that it's only now that I can sit down and write about it with any kind of sense. 
  
The back-story of the Encyclopedic Palace’s journey from the workshop of my grandfather, Marino Auriti, to a 22-year stay in a lonely storage locker in Newport, Delaware to, finally, the American Folk Art Museum can be found here on my blog.  For the press release from the Biennale in English, look here (“...the dream of universal, all-embracing knowledge crops up throughout history, as one that eccentrics like Auriti share with many other artists...”).

Marino Auriti with my melancholy grandmother, 
Maria Rachele Auriti, née di Sipio, in Brazil in the 1920s.

The way this thing has exploded all over the internet is still making my head spin and I send out my thanks to all you kind strangers who have written about it.

A carriage built by my grandfather in Guardiagrele, Italy.

A mail truck built by my grandfather in Guardiagrele.  
I remember my mother Colette being so proud of the breadth of 
the rounds it made I think it went between Pescara and Chieti, 
but that seems pretty ambitious for the time.

My family and friends are all amazed and thrilled, and I’m still walking around smiling at the news.  And yet I’m also left wondering what my grandfather, who died in 1980, would have made of all this.  Would it have perplexed him?  After all, the Encyclopedic Palace that he built in his workshop was only a model, one step along the way toward an actual building.  As I was emailing to a young woman in Rome who’s writing her thesis on Simon Rodia of Watts Tower fame and my grandfather (will wonders never cease?), Marino Auriti might have been a dreamer, but he was also a pragmatist.  He wanted the Palazzo Enciclopedico built.  I imagine he thought “paper” architecture had its place, but that place had little to do with him.  Utopian though he might have been, I think he was much closer in spirit to a Buckminster Fuller than an Étienne-Louis Boullée.  

The coffee thresher designed by Marino Auriti and a partner  
that would have produced untold wealth, so the story went,  
had Marino’s partner not beat him to patent.
 
Or maybe my grandfather would have just been thrilled by the news.  

Back in April of last year, Stacey Hollander at the American Folk Art Museum had hinted that the Encyclopedic Place might be going to the Biennale, but I didn’t want to get my hopes up.  I carried this in my mind for months, however, and in September, during the final days that the Encyclopedic Palace would be on display at the Folk Art Museum, I went up there to say goodbye to it.  Who knew what would happen to it as far as I knew, it might go back into storage.  It was a crazy hot summer day, and when I got to the museum it was mostly empty.  I walked around the Encyclopedic Palace, smiling like mad, and then did something I hadn’t done since I was a child I crouched down and looked through its tiny celluloid windows, into the building.  And I remembered how as a kid I was always outraged that it was empty inside.  I fully expected to see all of humankind’s inventions already in there, in perfect working order, each of them shrunk down to 1:400 scale.  
 
Marino Auriti paints the Scalinata della Trinità dei Monti.

After I said my good-bye, I crossed the street to Lincoln Center, lay down on the hot grass on that lovely, tilty lawn by Diller Scofidio + Renfrew itself as utopian a piece of architecture as you can find in New York City and I thought about my grandfather and the nature of miracles.    

My grandparents.

Monday, February 6, 2012

IO VIVO! The Encyclopedic Palace Rises Again


Friends, I wish I had the words to describe my happiness when I learned last week in an article in the New York Times that my grandfather’s great labor of love, an architectural model he called the Palazzo Enciclopedico, has once again been rescued from oblivion and is back up at the American Folk Art Museum – now at their space near Lincoln Center. (Thank you, Tom Hachtman, for that email.)

My grandfather, Marino Auriti, and his “crazy” endeavor meant, and mean, so much to me that it’s hard for me to assemble my thoughts about him.  I tried to write an essay about him at MacDowell in 1998, but merely succeeded in smoking lots of cigarettes, eating lots of carrot sticks, and banging my head against it all summer.  Later still I started a mini-comic about all this and made two issues, but then ran out of steam because of my seriously feeble drawing chops, and maybe more so because of the sadness that comes over me when I think too much about my family.  So please bear with me on this.      


Marino Auriti was born in 1891 in the town of Guardiagrele (provincia Chieti, regione Abruzzo) – I can still hear my grandfather saying ’Uardiagrele, with the world’s fattest U-sound in his dialetto Guardiese.  He was a carriage maker by trade, but had a dreamy turn of mind, and a facility for mechanical things.  Architecture was his great love.  As my mom would tell me when I was a kid, when the Fascists came to power, my grandfather was an outspoken critic – he published in a local paper satirical anti-Fascist poems, which she quaintly termed “bathroom verse” (and geez, one wishes one had a copy of that for the family archive).  As I wrote in my Tresca post, my grandfather really was one of those men who was forced to drink castor oil in the streets by Blackshirt goon squads.  Things got so hot that he and his brother and their families left Italy in the late 1920s.  I remember my mother telling me that the Fascists had taken their house, “one of the best houses in Guardiagrele.”  If it’s the same one I saw in the 1990s and again in 2006, not so much.  Many years after the fact, however, the loss of that house was loudly lamented, a downscaled version of exiled White Russians grieving over the loss of their dacha. 

Although my grandmother, Maria Rachele, was an American citizen (born on Christian Street in Philadelphia in the early 1900s) she was taken back to Italy when she was a baby and was very much an Abruzzese, or to get micro-specific the way Italians do, a PretoreseStill, she could have come back into this country easily, but because of the Johnson-Reed Immigration Act of 1924, the quota for Italians, among others, was tightly restricted – Italians emigrating to the U.S. went from an average of 200,000 per year in the first decade of the 20th century to less than 4,000 after the act was passed – and my grandfather could not enter the country.  The families went to Brazil instead, where my mother was born, in Catanduva, in the state of São Paulo, in 1928.  There my grandfather and a business associate invented something called a coffee thresher, which, family lore had it (the White Russians twisting their pearls again), would have made him a millionaire if the other man hadn’t stolen his patent and claimed the invention as his alone. 

No matter, though, because shortly thereafter, the Brazilian coffee market crashed.  The price per pound fell from 22.5 cents to 8 cents between 1929 and 1931.  I well remember the shock of recognition when I was in college and, in my beloved German film class, I saw the Bertolt Brecht-written film Kuhle Wampe.  At the end of the film, there’s a scene on a train where the characters talk about the tumbling world coffee market and someone cries out, “They’re burning coffee in the streets of Brazil!”  I was sitting there, in the dark in the middle of a lecture room in Fayerweather Hall round about 1988 and I realized:  God, all this really did happen.  These things played out on the world stage, this wasn’t just some piece of secret family history.  All the sorts of abstractions about History became real for me, if at a very late date.   

The family eventually came in through Ellis Island in the 1930s, and settled in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania because, as my mother would tell me, the cypress trees reminded my grandfather of home.


My grandfather built himself a huge garage, and set up an auto-body shop and “artistic framing” business; although I suspect, in the cultural hot spot that was Kennett, he never made any artistic frames for anything but his own work.  On the picture-framing side of the garage was his studio, where he made oil paintings after everything from old masters and photographs clipped out of National Geographic.  He was a pretty old guy by the time I was a kid (he was in his late 70s when I was born) and he’d given up painting by then.  I remember the last, unfinished painting on his easel, its outlines gridded out in pencil, of a Japanese woman eternally lifting a veil to her head.  I remember the wall of mitred frame corners, all so ornate, hanging in upside-down Vs and covered with the thick dust of many years. 

 Me, circa 1976, in my grandparents’ front yard in Kennett. I’m wearing my favorite 100% polyester shirt-and-scarf set, patterned with yellow roses set against a blue lattice background. Note mushroom house across the street. If you’re on the East Coast, check your button mushrooms or your baby Bellas – chances are they came from Kennett Square.

I have my grandfather’s copy after the second-tier Pre-Raphaelite painter, Henry Holiday, of The Meeting of Dante and Beatrice (charmingly titled in pencil, in my grandfather’s hand on the lower right-side, “MEETING DANTE AND BEATRICE,” kind of like Eating Raoul or Being John Malkovich).  It’s objectively pretty inept, has little to do with the original, but I worship it.

 The Henry Holiday painting, compliments of the Walker.

 Marino Auriti’s copy.

 And me, in Florence in 2008, by the bridge that was built at that crossing in the sixteenth century, the Ponte Santa Trinità – the same bridge that I note in an earlier post was bombed to bits by the retreating Germans during WWII, and reconstructed with its original stones, dredged from the Arno, in 1958. It’s flanked by allegorical statues representing each of the four seasons; the head of Primavera was not recovered from the river until 1961.

In the garage, on the other side of the studio wall, were hung salon-style, almost floor-to-ceiling, scores of his paintings, all of them, needless to say, artistically framed:  Raphael and Michelangelo he especially loved, and Leonardo, and others I’ve sadly forgotten now. (When I’d see the real version of one of these paintings in books as a kid, I’d say to my mom:  “Pop-pop painted that.”)  But the really cool thing was in the back, beyond the oil-soaked cement ground, the car parts, the enormous chassis of an old, long out-of-commission car (an Edsel?).  And that was the Encyclopedic Palace.

 Marino Auriti in his garage, with his models.

I can only imagine the frustration my grandfather must have felt, living in a town known as the Mushroom Capital of the World, enlivened only by, to hear my mother tell it, visits from the Javella water salesman.  My grandfather was an inveterate tinkerer and was always making things out of wood – cutting boards, footstools, and eventually architectural models.  I remember a tiny, beautiful building that I think was a model of my cousin Emma’s house and, of course, the elaborate, stepped cathedral with gold domes, surrounded by spindly cypress trees.  But it was after my grandfather retired, in the 1950s, when he set to work on his pièce de résistance, the Encyclopedic Palace.  This one wasn’t just a model, though. 

It was a design for a museum, a national monument. He filled notebooks developing its concept; in his statement of purpose, in my stiff translation from his Italian, he called it “…an entirely new concept in museums, designed to hold all the works of man in whatever field, all discoveries made and those that may follow.”  He wanted it built on the mall in DC – and if built at the time, at 136 stories, it would have been the tallest skyscraper in the world.  With its surrounding piazza it would take up 16 city blocks.  He built the model, at a scale of 1:200 meters, out of wood, brass, plastic, and tiny celluloid windows on which he drew mullions; for the tiny balustrades, he cut down hair combs.  And this time, so no one could scoop him, he secured a patent for his creation. 


In his statement of purpose, he proposed a plan for construction consisting of a skeleton of steel and cement; the round form, he noted, would allow the distribution of natural light internally to best advantage (not so much, considering the impossible depth of the building core, but that’s the pragmatic architecture-firm-day-job me talking here).  The building would have twenty-four entrances, 126 bronze statues of “writers, scientists, and artists past, present, and future” and, on the piazza, 220 Doric columns with more statues of writers, scientists, artists.  At each corner would be domed laboratories, topped by statues of allegorical figures representing each of the four seasons, much like the Ponte Santa Trinità. 

Apparently my grandfather wrote letters to find interested parties to fund the construction of the real Encyclopedic Palace (I wish I had just one of those letters) and had the model exhibited at a bank building on Broad Street in Philadelphia in the 1950s.  Outside of this, however, nothing else happened with his dream.  The Encyclopedic Palace, eleven feet tall and encased in a glass enclosure with its brass steeple poking though a hole in the top, sat in the corner of his garage in Kennett Square – the stuff of local myth – until my grandfather passed in 1980. 

After he died, no one knew what to do with the model (or models, plural, because the cathedral was also pretty big).  Both were taken apart and put in it a storage locker in some grim section of Newport, Delaware.  As the years went by my mother would write letters to try and find a home for the Encyclopedic Palace, and only get vague replies, if any.  People weren’t talking so much about “Outsider Art” in those days.  As I got older, after college, I took over this job from her, writing letters and offering to donate the model, until one bizarrely mean response from the Franklin Institute – of all places! And I’d had such fond memories of visiting the Heart there when I was a kid – made me lose heart, so to speak, entirely.

The knowledge that this thing was moldering in storage was always somewhere in my mind though, and in 2001, when my mother’s health got very bad, my sister Poogy and I decided we had to do something about it.  Damian and I went down there and, in the car driving to the storage locker on a miserable, overcast afternoon, we all tried to calculate how much money twenty-two years of monthly storage locker payments had been costing my grandmother’s “estate”…porca miseria.  The key to the locker had long been lost, and so my brawny brother-in-law Jimmy cut the lock.  We opened up the storage locker and, inside…the shit looked terrible.

I was heartbroken. We put a new lock back on the storage unit, and drove away.  This seemed just like another huge piece of folly, like everything else the dreamers in my family touched.

Another year went by, and we rallied.  We went back down there, unlocked the unit, and took out some pieces…I held them up to the light, the clouds parted…and the pieces looked beautiful.  In need of some restoration.  But beautiful.

 Inside the storage locker, after twenty-two years.

 Out in the light...

The American Folk Art Museum had just put up its new building, designed by Tod Williams/Billie Tsien, on 53rd Street, and an architect I worked with was telling me about how among its collection was, of all things, an architectural model of the Empire State Building made entirely from wooden toggles.  They like architectural models, fabulous, I thought!  I paid the museum a visit and…I felt a huge letdown.  It was pure sweet Americana, weathervanes and quilts and Shaker valentines…no old weird America here.  But then, as I went down the stairs to the more modern floors, I saw a painting by the great self-taught Italian-American painter Ralph Fasanella.  It was of his father, an iceman, crucified in a block of ice pierced with pairs of ice tongs.  I looked at this painting, and I felt such a mixture of grief and hope that I burst into tears. 

 Ralph Fasanella's Iceman Crucified #3.    

And then I thought:  this is the place! 

I wrote the main curator there an impassioned letter describing the Encyclopedic Palace and telling her my family would like to donate it.  Amazingly, I got an instant reply.  They sent a pair of art handlers and a curator down to Pennsylvania, and my sister and I drove out with them to the storage locker.  As the art handlers took out pieces of the model – the idea was that they’d bring it to their warehouse in Queens to evaluate whether they could acquire it or not – the curator was, bless this woman, trailing after them picking up tiny celluloid windows and carefully putting them in zip-lock baggies.  I remember Poogy giving me her characteristic look of high absurdity – of course they wanted this thing if they were treating it with such care.       

And, of course, they did want it.  I helped raise money for its restoration, through the company I worked for, and it was unveiled at the American Folk Art Museum as part of its Folk Art Revealed show in 2004.  My grandfather would have been 113 years old that year. 

 Folk Art Revealed, 2004

The Encyclopedic Palace was on display into 2006 or so and then I heard through friends who went there to see it that it had disappeared.  It wasn’t part of the permanent display.  It was put away somewhere, in storage…in some big storage locker in some dim part of the city…. 

Over the last few years, I kept reading about how the American Folk Art Museum was having financial trouble.  As I read increasingly dire articles about it, I kept thinking I should get in touch with my contact there, wonderful Brooke Anderson; then I read she’d left to go to LA MoCA.  Last year the museum went off the rails financially and sold to MoMA the 53rd Street building, for which they’d disastrously overspent.  There was talk of transferring the collection to the Smithsonian or some of it going to the Brooklyn Museum.  Oh, splendid, I thought, now the Encyclopedic Palace has officially vanished.  Polvere tu sei e in polvere tornerai…

 
So you can probably imagine my amazement and delight when, late last month, I got the email with a link to the New York Times article, with a wonderful write-up by Ken Johnson ("You have probably never heard of Marino Auriti...") with a huge photograph of the Encyclopedic Palace. 

Photo from the New York Times, by Chester Higgins Jr.  

As a child, I remember my grandfather as a dour presence, rarely smiling, never laughing.  He didn’t seem to have a lot of use for English, or America, or the late capitalist twentieth century.  He and my grandmom seemed to always carry so much grief within them – over the loss of their homeland; maybe, for him, the loss of his dreams.  My mother was devoted to her father, and when he died she was in her fifties but she still called him daddy.  The house in Kennett so beloved by us all was sold, without any kind of consultation, by my bumbling father, and the garage was converted into a lousy vinyl-sided hunk of junk.  My mother was so sad over the whole thing.  Then she told me about a dream she had about my grandfather.  She was back at the house in Kennett, and walked out of the kitchen door and into the side yard (how well I remember that yard).  My grandfather was standing there, looking like a young man, and in his hand was a tiny, living tree with its root ball intact.  He looked at her and said:  Io vivo.

I live.