Showing posts with label Nunzio Pernicone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nunzio Pernicone. Show all posts

Friday, December 28, 2018

Two Excellent Books about Italian-American Radicalism


Italian Immigrant Radical Culture: The Idealism of the Sovversivi in the United States, 1890–1940, by Marcella Bencivenni 
+ 
a Brief Sidebar about The Lost World of Italian-American Radicalism, edited by Philip Cannistraro and Gerald Meyer 

Italian Immigrant Radical Culture, 
published by NYU Press (2011).

What a terrific book! I stumbled across it at the Mulberry Street Library. Besides being a concise overview focused on the culture of Italian-American radicalism from the beginning of the era of mass Italian immigration to the U.S. up until WWII, it’s a heroic act of research, reconstruction, and reclamation on the part of its author, Marcella Bencivenni. 

Bencivenni first provides a general background on Italian radical movements in the U.S., then a sort of collective profile of the sovversivi—a group, far from united, that takes in anarchists, socialists, syndicalists, and later communists and anti-fascists—and then focuses successive chapters on the radical press, the stage, and literary radicals. The final two chapters discuss the all but forgotten poet Arturo Giovannitti and a political cartoonist who was unknown to me, Fort Velona. Many other intriguing sovversivi, from revolutionaries to littĂ©rateurs (and sometimes both) were also barely known to me until I read about them here, among them the Abruzzese poet Virgilia D’Andrea. 

Indeed, Italian Immigrant Radical Culture touches on many people who could be said to have fallen into relative oblivion—at least in the mainstream—while also being an excellent corrective to the annoyingly tenacious notion of Italian-Americans always tilting conservative. In Bencivenni’s own words, “In part I wrote this book to rescue these untold stories from historical oblivion, and challenge the highly generalized view of Italian immigrants as a compact block of conservative, apathetic and apolitical peasants.” Bencivenni’s book is in a way a continuation and distillation of ideas put forth in the rich, overflowing essay collection The Lost World of Italian-American Radicalism, edited by Philip Cannistraro and Gerald Meyer—a book that’s the wellspring for so much Italian-American radical history. These books are like catnip to me.

There are some revelations in Bencivenni’s study that I don’t think I’ve seen elsewhere. One is the evidence that, as early as the late 19th century, anti-colonialist critiques of Columbus’ “discovery” of America had been formulated and discussed in the Italian-language press. As Bencivenni writes: “In a bold article published in 1892, Il Grido degli Oppressi, for example, labeled Christopher Columbus ‘a pirate and adventurer,’ arguing that, far from being ‘Italy’s great glory,’ his discovery of America marked the beginning of Europe’s ‘colonial politics,’ launching ‘a series of terrible massacres and usurpations against the native people and the Africans.’” What an enlightened analysis for the time—I was amazed to read this. Bencivenni also adds up the evidence and gives us the depressing news (certainly supported by studies of individual anarchists and radicals I’ve read elsewhere) that so many of these otherwise informed men of the left were also the most wretched misogynists: “For all their talk about emancipation and equality, when it came to gender it is fairly obvious that the sovversivi regarded politics as a male, public sphere and family as a female, private sphere. They were also notoriously known as womanizers.” And later, in the chapter that looks at the radical stage: “Radical Italian men, in particular, seemed incapable of truly questioning male authority, even as they advocated gender equality.”

Another revelation, this one on the positive side, was the sheer number of Italian-language radical papers that were published back in the day. There were not only the short-lived Il Grido degli Oppressi and Carlo Tresca’s Il Martello but, among many others, the anarcho-syndicalist La Questione Sociale, “the major organ of Italian revolutionary socialism” Il Proletario, Luigi Galleani’s Cronaca Sovversiva and its successor L’Adunata dei Refratti­—which, incredibly, lasted until 1971, remaining “a powerful, if lonely, voice of anarchist protest.” Perhaps nothing shows both the decline of Italian-American radicalism, and the degree of the population’s assimilation into the American mainstream, quite so much as the gradual extinction of the Italian-language radical press. 

The wonderful old banner of Cronaca Sovversiva. 
Thrilled to discover that the Library of Congress 
has made available for download what looks to be 

Bencivenni’s study also contains plenty of random, fascinating, micro-level New York City history stuff. One example among many: in 1908, when the Catholic Church was cracking down on purveyors of “anti-clerical literature,” one of the booksellers arrested was the owner of S.F. Vanni over on West 12th Street. That store, which first opened in 1884, persisted into this century, and I remember years back (in the ’90s?) poking around inside of it, and being mystified by the dusty crumblingness of it, and its almost Miss Havisham–like level of spooky neglect. What was going on? Much later I learned that Dr. Olga Ragusa, the formidable Italian studies icon (and author of the ubiquitous and personally indispensible, if not exactly pleasurable Essential Italian Grammar, published by Dover), owned the building and lived upstairs. After a brief and heartening moment in 2015 when the Centro Primo Levi revived the store, sadly, it closed again, for good. It is now a gallery specializing in super-fancy French design.

S.F. Vanni in 2009. Go here for an article from 
La Voce di New York about Dr. Ragusa and 
a terrific short video with Centro Primo Levi’s 
Alessandro Cassin about S.F. Vanni’s brief revival, 
or here for a related article from the New Yorker.

Meanwhile, John Pucciatti’s Spaghetti House, some blocks over on East 12th Street, which apparently took out ads in the radical press calling itself “the favorite meeting place of free thinkers of all nationalities” is of course still in operation. Today it’s called John’s of 12th Street, and I’d say one would be hard-pressed to find any vestiges of that radical history there, though the pasta remains reliably old-school. Here’s an interview from 2013 on EV Grieve with the John’s then-owner, with some great brief anecdotes about the old East Village.

What I’ve written here is a very glancing appreciation that can’t begin to do justice to the level of scholarship and dedication shown in Marcella Bencivenni’s book. I can only reiterate what a welcome addition to radical history studies Italian Immigrant Radical Culture is—and hope that it will, in turn, beget more of its kind.

Go here for a brief, informative review by Paul Buhle 
of The Lost World of Italian-American Radicalism (2003).

And for those who haven’t read The Lost World of Italian-American Radicalism, it’s a treasure. Among the essays in it that spoke to me most were Mary Jo Bona’s generous and insightful “Rooted to Family: Italian American Women’s Radical Novels” (which discusses, among other writers, Carole Maso, always an inspiration to me), Edvige Giunta’s powerful “Where They Came From: Italian American Women Writers as Public Intellectuals,” Gil Fagiani’s essay on Mario Savio, Donna R. Gabaccia’s conclusion, and Nunzio Pernicone’s “War among the Italian Anarchists: The Galleanisti’s Campaign against Carlo Tresca.” Dr. Pernicone’s essay begins: “A cursory history of the Italian American Left might easily promote the impression that immigrant radicals … spent more time and energy squabbling amongst themselves than they did fighting the ruling class.” I can certainly hear his singularly erudite and exasperated voice in these words—as well as hearing the echo of this idea in the many factional quarrels that play out today, too often, among what I’ll imprecisely call the American left.

In her book, Bencivenni cites Pernicone as a mentor and, indeed, she gives him the last word: “The Italian American Left failed to reproduce itself,” she quotes him as writing, “and with its demise ‘a unique breed of dreamers and rebels also passed into extinction.’” Such melancholy truth to these words. I briefly had the pleasure of knowing Nunzio by email, and what a delight he was. An engaged person, full of opinions, humor, and heart; and also a scholar always ready to help. Dr. Pernicone died in 2013, another dreamer who passed into extinction, but his work lives on, as does the work of so many dreamers whom Bencivenni pays homage to in her admirable book.


The much-missed Dr. Nunzio Pernicone 
in the 2006 documentary, Sacco and Vanzetti. 


Sunday, October 30, 2016

Remembering Francesca Rosa


I wonder if it’s more miserable or more gentle to find out about a friend’s death when an email you send her comes back as undeliverable. Well, it’s done now, and with the passing of Francesca Rosa the world has lost one lovely, amused, engagĂ©, and deeply kind person. She wrote as F.S. Rosa, and published a massive novel called The Divine Comedy of Carlo Tresca—which is how we met, when she sent me an email after reading a blog post I wrote about Carlo Tresca: Portrait of a Rebel. That book was written by Nunzio Pernicone—“the leading historian of Italian anarchism in the United States”—another large-hearted, committed, eyes-wide-open person I’d meet by email, and who departed this planet in 2013. Non averei creduto che morte tanta n’avesse disfatta. Cancer, in both cases; and also in both cases, if Francesca and Dr. Pernicone were to show up in Dante, once could safely bet the farm that it would be in Paradiso. 

Francesca Rosa and me at the Original U.S. Restaurant in North Beach, 2013. Here is another remembrance of her, and an interview, on Robin Tremblay-McGaw's blog, X Poetics. 







What a sweetie Francesca was. She worked for more than 30 years at the Arc San Francisco, working with people with developmental disabilities while, from what I could see, always writing and keeping active in her union and the larger community. She forever described herself as a “rank and file union member,” and a longtime student of labor and left history, and wore that both proudly and humbly. In emails that we wrote to each other I joked that I was an “underperforming anarchist” and she called herself an “anarcho-syndicalist with bourgeois tendencies,” though I never saw the bourgeois part, unless she was talking about liking a glass of red wine and a good plate of gnocchi.

Just as she was a committed activist and progressive, she loved the Italian stuff—the lore, the stories, the folkways. If I remember this right, her people were Sicilian on one side, Neapolitan on the other. Like in so many families, Italian or otherwise, there was plenty of political strife. She told me in an email that when her grandfather on her mother’s side, Joseph Mosarra, went to work at the Italian Center in Stamford, Connecticut (which had been started by her paternal grandfather, who became “a big fan of Fascism”), the first thing he did when he got there was “take down all the pictures of Mussolini.” I shared stories about my grandfather, Marino Auriti, fleeing Italy after the Fascists seized his family’s house in Abruzzo and then, when I was a kid, how I was fascinated and confused by a great-uncle’s Fascist armband that was, for whatever reason, kept in a drawer in my grandparents’ house in Pennsylvania. I assumed later this was some sort of Santayanan reminder about remembering the past lest we doom ourselves to repeat it. 

Francesca and I met in person only once, over a long weekend in San Francisco. We both had a feeling of instant and deep familiarity, like we’d known each other forever. I remember we were in the unlikely neighborhood of Union Square, having some kind of beverage, taking about publishers, and I said something about a friend whose collection of essays was coming out on Akashic Books. Francesca didn’t know the publisher, but loved the name—“like the Akashic records,” she said. I didn’t know what that was, and she told me that akasha was Sanskrit for “ether,” that the idea was from theosophy (I think she might have used the words “old hippy thing”) and that, to be super-reductive here, it was a collection of all knowledge, all actions, and all desires, recorded in the astral plane. I joked that it sort of sounded like the internet, only without all the freaky trolls. I also said it reminded me of the notion of the Recording Angel, something that gets many a young person through a long night: the idea being that you have been seen, you have been witnessed, and, because of this, some of the loneliness of your life has been allayed. And so let me leave you with this: the idea of Francesca Rosa in the ether, over the airwaves, in our hearts.